Everand Logo

Bienvenue sur Everand!

  • Découvrez des millions d'e-books, de livres audio et bien plus encore avec un essai gratuit

    Seulement $11.99/mois après la période d'essai. Annulez à tout moment.

    Ainsi Parlait Zarathoustra
    Ainsi Parlait Zarathoustra
    Ainsi Parlait Zarathoustra
    Livre électronique519 pages7 heures

    Ainsi Parlait Zarathoustra

    Par Friedrich Nietzsche

    4/5

    ()

    Lire l'aperçu
    LangueFrançais
    ÉditeurArchive Classics
    Date de sortie1 janv. 1932
    Ainsi Parlait Zarathoustra
    Auteur

    Friedrich Nietzsche

    Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900) was an acclaimed German philosopher who rose to prominence during the late nineteenth century. His work provides a thorough examination of societal norms often rooted in religion and politics. As a cultural critic, Nietzsche is affiliated with nihilism and individualism with a primary focus on personal development. His most notable books include The Birth of Tragedy, Thus Spoke Zarathustra. and Beyond Good and Evil. Nietzsche is frequently credited with contemporary teachings of psychology and sociology.

    Auteurs associés

    Lié à Ainsi Parlait Zarathoustra

    Livres électroniques liés

    Épisodes de podcast liés

    Articles associés

    • Article

      MARION COTILLARD Glam sœur

      9 nov. 2022

      MARION COTILLARD Glam sœur
      Lecture de 9 min

    • Article

      Aide-toi, Le Stoïcisme T’aidera

      5 janv. 2022

      Aide-toi, Le Stoïcisme T’aidera
      Lecture de 5 min

    • Article

      Sénèque, Le Suicidé Magnifique

      29 oct. 2020

      Le suicide de Sénèque, en 65 ap. J.-C., est l’un des moments les plus dramatiques de toute l’histoire de la philosophie. Presque cinq siècles après le procès de Socrate (399 av. J.-C.), il symbolise à la fois la lutte inlassable des philosophes contr

      Lecture de 2 min

    • Article

      Quelle Liseuse pour Cet Été?

      10 juin 2021

      Quelle Liseuse pour Cet Été?
      Lecture de 6 min

    • Article

      Sous Le Règne D’Aristote

      17 déc. 2020

      Sous Le Règne D’Aristote
      Lecture de 5 min

    • Article

      Game Over Pour Les Traders ?

      15 déc. 2021

      Game Over Pour Les Traders ?
      Lecture de 3 min

    • Article

      La Fontaine, Fabuleux Fabuliste

      14 avr. 2021

      La Fontaine, Fabuleux Fabuliste
      Lecture de 4 min

    • Article

      Alexis Michalik LOIN

      22 août 2019

      Mais où s’arrêtera donc Alexis Michalik? L’auteur franco-britannique a décidément le goût du risque.Comédien de talent, dramaturge au succès phénoménal, réalisateur prometteur, ce surdoué se lance cette fois le défi de l’écriture romanesque, en publi

      Lecture de 10 min

    • Article

      Kolkhoze Toujours…

      30 avr. 2022

      Ouf. Contrairement à toutes les craintes et spéculations, le preux chevalier Emmanuel de Toutezelles-et-Zeux terrassa le blond dragon aux sept têtes, le Belzébuth à couteau entre les dents et chaton dans les mains, bref, le chiffre 666 sous ménopause

      Lecture de 2 min

    • Article

      Patricia Darré, La Star Des Médiums

      10 août 2023

      Rencontrer Patricia Darré, c’est prendre conscience très rapidement qu’on ne pourra pas en placer une. Au moins la première heure. Telle une tornade, elle déboule dans la fournaise estivale, traînant derrière elle une grosse valise: « Je fais juste u

      Lecture de 4 min

    • Article

      Dans Mes Bras, Frère Clément !

      23 avr. 2023

      Hugo, mon frère, pardonne-moi de t’avoir sous-estimé, car voilà que toi aussi tu as reçu cet irrésistible appel qui t’a incité à pointer le nez au débat organisé par Valeurs actuelles. J’imagine que nous avons tous, à un moment ou un autre, besoin de

      Lecture de 2 min

    • Article

      HOMÈRE L’ODYSSÉE Version française : Emmanuel Lascoux

      29 avr. 2021

      Muse, dis-moi l’homme aux détours, l’homme aux ruses qui connut tant d’errance, à peine achevé le saccage de Troie, la cité sainte : tous les gens dont il vit les villes, et dont il sonda les pensées ! Tous les coups, tous les revers, qu’il essuya su

      Lecture de 6 min

    • Article

      Les Cavaliers

      1 sept. 2022

      On trouvait la halte de l’autre côté du col, en contrebas, sur le premier palier du versant nord. C’était une vaste table rocheuse, murée à l’ouest par la montagne, coupée à l’est par une gorge où grondait un torrent. En cet endroit prédestiné, faisa

      Lecture de 10 min

    • Article

      Alain Mabanckou LE COMMERCE DES ALLONGÉS

      4 juil. 2022

      La veillée funéraire durant laquelle famille et chanteusespleureuses se seront relayées pour un dernier au revoir aura duré quatre jours, comme le veut la tradition. Tout le monde s'est désormais éclipsé et la vie peut reprendre son cours au cimetièr

      Lecture de 9 min

    • Article

      « On Est Puceau De L’horreur Comme On L’est De La Volupté »

      15 août 2021

      Le village c’était réservé rien que pour l’Étatmajor, ses chevaux, ses cantines, ses valises, et aussi pour ce saligaud de commandant. Il s’appelait Pinçon ce salaud-là, le commandant Pinçon. J’espère qu’à l’heure actuelle il est bien crevé (et pas d

      Lecture de 6 min

    • Article

      Constance Debré, ce « héros »

      30 janv. 2022

      Constance Debré, ce « héros »
      Lecture de 4 min

    • Article

      Jean-Paul Dubois TOUS LES HOMMES N’HABITENT PAS LE MONDE DE LA MÊME FAÇON

      27 juin 2019

      Paul Christian Frederic Hansen, le narrateur du nouveau roman de Jean-Paul Dubois, Tous les hommes n’habitent pas le monde de la même façon, est né à Toulouse cinq ans après l’auteur de La Succession (2016). Le fils de la Toulousaine Anna Madeleine M

      Lecture de 10 min

    • Article

      Trois Hommes Dans Un Bateau

      2 juin 2021

      Nous dressâmes une première liste que nous dûmes écarter. Il était clair que le cours supérieur de la Tamise ne permettrait pas la navigation d’un bateau assez grand pour contenir le matériel que nous venions de décréter indispensable. Nous déchirâme

      Lecture de 2 min

    • Article

      Francis Ford Coppola

      28 juin 2019

      Quelles sont les bonnes choses et les mauvaises choses que le succès prodigue? Pour moi, le succès et l’échec sont les deux facettes d’une seule et même chose. Et cela remonte au temps où les hommes se disaient “Allez, on retourne chasser le rhinocér

      Lecture de 2 min

    • Article

      Lettre à Dostoïevski

      23 oct. 2022

      « Cher Fiodor, Par je ne sais quel étrange concours de circonstances, me voilà propulsé dans cet automne doux et poisseux du Paris de 2022. Une chose immonde s’est produite ici. Quand je dis immonde, c’est pour t’épargner les détails les plus scabre

      Lecture de 2 min

    Avis sur Ainsi Parlait Zarathoustra

    4/5

    24 notations26 avis

    Qu'avez-vous pensé ?

    Appuyer pour évaluer

    L'avis doit comporter au moins 10 mots

    • 2/5
      Zeer taaie lectuur. Mooie openingscene: ik leer u de Uebermens, God is dood...
    • 3/5
      Reminded me of the Koran. Short, Sweet and Authoritarian. Nietzsche being Nietzsche nonetheless, very difficult not to appreciate the satirical, nihilistic effect of the big metaphorical picture.
    • 2/5
      Zeer taaie lectuur. Mooie openingscene: ik leer u de Uebermens, God is dood...
    • 3/5
      This book is of a very odd type. It is presented very much as one would envision a prophet's tale from any number of religious backgrounds. This seems like an attempt to create a following for a gnostic religious outlook, and a way for Nietzsche to live on in a form similar to the christian prophets and stories he so adamantly spoke out against in his book "Beyond Good and Evil".
    • 3/5
      Thus Spoke Zarathustra is a difficult book to read. In fact, literary critic like Harold Bloom called it "unreadable"! Why, then is it one of Nietzsche's most famous works? Why is it reprinted generation after generation? What made it "the book of choice" (345) for German soldiers on the battlefield?Zarathustra is the story of a man who leaves his contemplation to share his wisdom with the rest of humanity. The book contains eighty short chapters on various repetitive themes and ideas that have no logical order. This is not a carefully crafted philosophical argument?it is a collection of ideas thrown out to take root in people's minds.Three themes stand out above the rest:1) It was here that Nietzsche first claimed that God is dead.2) Humanity needs to evolve into the Superman (or Overman), a person beyond good and evil.3) The Superman embraces "eternal recurrence"(341) by taking ownership of everything that has happened and will happen again.In Zarathustra, Nietzsche called on people to reject the moral claims of the religious and embrace the will to power. Nietzsche viewed Christianity as a religion of weakness (which, ironically, it is?God's strength demonstrated in weakness).Nietzsche's desire to evolve beyond mere humanity to the Superman is a lonely task. In the end, Zarathustra leaves all his weak followers behind. There is no room for a community of Supermen?only a lone powermonger. Thus Spoke Zarathustra is no less than a manifesto for an anti-Christ.
    • 4/5
      How do you overcome your life? Perhaps by reading Schopenhauer or better yet by reading Friedrich Nietzsche. Thus Spoke Zarathustra is Nietzsche as poet philosopher. The titular character and protagonist of the book, Zarathustra, is portrayed in the chapter "Thousand and One Goals" as "the creator" (p 58). Through his travels and speeches and especially his introspective monologues we experience discourse on the nature of knowledge (gnosis), spirit, language, judgement and consciousness. This is a work that expounds some of Nietzsche's key ideas such as "eternal recurrence" and the "death of god". The latter represents a shift in the grounding of morality as Nietzsche rejects the traditional view the morality comes from God above. Instead replacing this view with a morality based in the existence of the individual, thus making Nietzsche a precursor if not one of the founders of existentialist philosophy. The mythic poetical style of this work mark its literary quality and make it read like a spiritual work. It also has an aphoristic quality that permeates Nietzsche's writing. While it is a difficult book to read the questions it raises make it worth the effort of those interested in a more literary approach to philosophy.
    • 3/5
      Ah Nietzsche, you crazy old cat. Doesn't hold up nearly as well to a re-reading in my 40s, compared to the impression it made upon me in my 20s. Beautiful Folio Society edition.
    • 5/5
      Seductively attractive writing style.
    • 4/5
      This book is so different from anything else I've ever read that I don't quite know what to say. Don't... try... this... at home?
    • 3/5
      I find it very difficult to rate or access--or even make much sense of this book. Reading it I often thought to myself it was little wonder Nietzsche ended his life in an insane asylum. I don't know that I can say I really "liked" it (three stars) or found it "OK" (two stars on Goodreads) but I just can't say I had a "meh" reaction or hated it--I did find it worthwhile a read--thought-provoking and even beautiful in parts.It's not what I expected. I'd heard various things about Nietzsche. That he was Ayn Rand on steroids. That he was a seminal philosopher and this his most important (or just infamous?) work. That he is the "Godfather of Fascism." I can't say I saw any of those things in this work. Whatever you might think of Ayn Rand's arguments, she does have them, even in her novels--indeed, it's what many readers complain about in her speechifying. Whatever I might think of Plato or Kant or Rousseau, or find difficult or abstruse, I do recognize they are presenting reasoned logical arguments for their positions worthy of philosophy. Nietzsche is different, or at least Thus Spake Zarathustra is. It's famously full of aphorisms--that is strikingly stated views we're supposed to take on faith so to speak--as in sacred texts. Indeed, the style very deliberately echoes the rhythms and rhetoric of scripture. Zarathustra is the character and mouthpiece for a philosophy presented through speeches, parables and stories--such as what happens when he's bitten by a snake--but not really through reasoned argument. To my mind that takes it out of the realm of philosophy and makes this more akin to Lao-Tzu's Tao Te Ching than Plato's Republic.And I admit, for all the notorious calls for the "Superman" and references to a "will to power" I found it hard to see the roots of fascism here--unless you really, really twist things. In contrast it was easy to see the roots of the totalitarian left in Plato's Republic and Rousseau's Social Contract. Maybe it's just that given we're much more sympathetic to the totalitarian left in America (I had several Marxist professors) I'm much more alive to the implications in works that tend that way. But I could see Nietzsche's call for the Superman as a call to aspire to the best in ourselves--I didn't detect anything racist or particularly Darwinian in it. Similarly I could see the "will to power" as more ambitious striving than a call for domination. Nor did I find anything anti-semitic in its thrust--Nietzsche seems an equal opportunity iconoclast. I do resonate a bit with his message about religion presenting a "slave" mentality. That's one of the things I find most disturbing about religion, besides its basis in the supernatural. That the call of religion above all is for unquestioning obedience, and every time I see a reference to God using "He" in uppercase I'm reminded of and am disturbed by that. But then the assessment above means assuming I read Nietzsche right, and I'm by no means sure about that on a first read, and am doubtful I'd go in for seconds. He's certainly an interesting if disturbing thinker.
    • 5/5
      It will excite any teenager, but highly recommended to anyone.
    • 4/5
      Thus Spake Zarathustra differs from most of Nietzsche's other works in that it has as much in common with a novel as a philosophical work. This makes it more difficult to interpret than his more traditionally academic works, as he tries to convey his philosophy not only in words, but in narration of actions, moods, and tone, more so than elsewhere. Sometimes the message is too loud, or the writing too exuberant for it to possess the clarity found in his more restrained works. It would be more difficult to attempt a summary of what this book says than to describe what it variously is: bombastic, profound, lyrical, sentimental, ruthless, tender, and hearty in several senses of the word.Though the book appears to be full of meaning, some of Nietzsche's thoughts come across less ambiguously than others. One of these being the exaltation of the strong and despising of the weak; this he justifies on a moral level, which is in itself worth discussing. How can someone be truly good, unless he has the power to do evil and refrains? How can someone be truly virtuous who is weak and lacks the strength for proper wickedness? This mirrors the other aspect of the question of morality: who can be evil who knows not what wickedness is? Can only the wise, who has an intellectual understanding of moral questions be truly virtuous, as they can knowingly choose between good and evil? This elevation of power and knowledge as necessary for virtue is at least partly why he places the superman, or ubermensch, as the goal of humanity ? as they alone are capable of true virtue, a state which Nietzsche describes as being beyond good and evil. There is also the recurring theme of the mountain, which he implies to be where the Ubermensch belongs, at least some of the time. This is surely metaphorical for, amongst other things, surpassing oneself and others, solitude, and elevation. This, I feel, is partly just him justifying post hoc what he feels instinctively; Nietzsche was very athletic in his youth, and undoubtedly an intellect, and he could be accused of praising the qualities that he feels that he himself possesses. Whether this was a conscious undertaking, or something driven from the subconscious, it would be difficult to say, but I think that it is mainly the latter. I don't think Nietzsche was dishonest or vain, I think he is was driven to write in support of what he thought was the truth. Even if the delivery of his message might be objectionable to some, which I cannot doubt, I think his thoughts deserve an open-minded scrutiny. To react emotionally to a question inhibits one from making a fair answer, yet this plays both ways for Nietzsche, much of what he writes is written in a way that makes it palatable and attractive by way of the lifefulness of it. The final third of the book then goes onto what seems like a partly separate track, and I don't think it was quite obvious what Nietzsche meant by it all. He talks about the "Higher Man" a lot, but this idea is then broken down into a multiplicity of things which do not seem higher at all, and it is doubtful at the end whether this can either be reassembled, or if it ever existed in the first place. Night, and then Day, also replace the mountain in importance in the final section. There is also the recurring theme of "God is dead", and while this seems to mean something in some places, it doesn't in others, yet the meaning does seem clear in Nietzsche's Joyful Wisdom. In addition to this there are numerous other Biblical allusions and quotation.Something I found curious was a parallel between events and moods in the book and stages in Carl Jung's description of individuation, which would probably be worth closer examination. Nietzsche had psychological problems, and went mad, and that his writing has parallels with stages of psychological development is intriguing.The questions and thoughts mentioned above are all to be found in the book, though more often than not they must be read from between the lines. Sometimes a sentence in itself will contain an hours worth of thought, but much of the philosophy in this book runs below the surface, and must be extracted by the thinking reader. This book is not a good introduction to the philosophy of Nietzsche as it is more challenging than most of his other works. His Joyful Wisdom has many of the same themes as this and a somewhat similar tone; much of what he says here in a roundabout way he says there clearly.
    • 5/5
      Being Nietzsche's attempt to provide a summary of his Weltanschauung in an unsystematic, literary format (for a somewhat more conventional version of same, try Beyond good and evil). The book is wonderful, heady reading, though Nietzsche's philosophy, never conventional anyway, does sometimes become a trifle difficult to excavate from the poetic turns.
    • 4/5
      Nietzsche was one tortured dude. He suffered to an extreme physically, with insomnia, stomach cramps, migraines, bloody vomiting, hemorrhoids, lack of appetite, and night sweats, and on top of all that, he was nearly blind. He spent long, lonely hours hunched over his writings and ultimately suffered a complete mental breakdown at the age of 45 that left him in the care of his mother for most of what remained of his life. It?s ironic that such a cowed man would write feverishly of transcending the all-too-human in the form of the ?Ubermensch? (Overman, or Superman). Zarathustra is the prophet who descends down from the mountains in Biblical fashion to deliver this message to humanity. His main principles:1. God is dead.2. Traditional virtues and the morality of the masses (e.g. Christianity) promote mediocrity.3. Education of the masses and popular culture also promotes mediocrity, lowering social standards.4. Man must rise above the masses and the ?all-too-human? to give his life meaning, and he who does this will be the Ubermensch. ?What is the ape to man? A laughing-stock or a painful embarrassment. And man shall be just that for the overman??5. Power and strength of will characterize the Ubermensch, as do lightness of mind and exuberance, as seen in dance.As with a lot of original thinkers, Nietzsche was controversial all around: radicals claimed him for #1 and #2; conservatives for #3 and #4. The German military used portion of Nietzsche as a part of the mindset for both WWI and WWII; it was easy to extrapolate ?Ubermensch? to ?Master Race?, which is obviously an ugly association.There are elements of truth in #3 and #4 but the reverse, to over-stratify society and threaten a return to conditions at the time of the Industrial Revolution or prior, rubs me the wrong way. It?s a fine balance and it seems to me Nietzsche was too much of a reactionary. Another theme in this book, eternal recurrence, also seems a little odd in the extreme he takes it, and I?m not a big fan of his views on women.However, I do like and agree with the concept of needing to develop meaning for ourselves in this bleak universe and all-too-short life, and of needing to transcend the baser aspects of humanity. I also appreciate the strength of his writing, his originality, and elements of his arguments. In that way I am reminded of Ayn Rand, who I also like in spite of my liberal political views. I guess what I?m saying is, thumbs up, even if you?re not a Nazi.Quotes:On the lightness of being, and individuality:?I would believe only in a god who could dance. And when I saw my devil I found him serious, thorough, profound, and solemn: it was the spirit of gravity - through him all things fall.Not by wrath does one kill but by laughter. Come, let us kill the spirit of gravity!I have learned to walk: ever since, I let myself run. I have learned to fly: ever since, I do not want to be pushed before moving along.Now I am light, now I fly, now I see myself beneath myself, now a god dances through me.?On loneliness:?O you loving fool, Zarathustra, you are trust-overfull. But thus you have always been: you have always approached everything terrible trustfully. You have wanted to pet every monster. A whiff of warm breath, a little soft tuft on the paw - and at once you were ready to love and to lure it.Love is the danger of the loneliest; love of everything if only it is alive. Laughable, verily, are my folly and my modesty in love.?
    • 5/5
      This novel was extremely hard-going for me, not only because of the extremely rich language, poetry and metaphor employed, and not only because of the immense effort of interpretation required to come to a full personal understanding of it, but because I read it at a time where my life was topsy-turvy with emotional turmoil. Bizarrely, however, and totally unexpectedly, this philosophical bomb of a book ultimately did more in the way of rooting me firmly to the ground than it did to blow me out of orbit. So, while it is easy to see how Nietzsche may have driven himself to mental illness in the writing of this book, fortunately for me, it had completely the opposite effect.This important novel is not only a incisively written parody of the cackling buffoonery of the average prophet, with a firm digit jabbed accusingly at the Zoroastrian origins of popular monotheistic religion, but a forceful delivery of the values of the Übermensch, pulling no punches from what Nietzsche considers the culturally obsolete meek servant of God. I am hardly surprised that the devoutly religious detested this book, for it impels man to take charge of his own destiny, and not simply be the self-flagellating subject of an absent father, whether said father really exists or not.I like to think that, if there is a hell, Nietzsche is definitely in it, and he is grinning stubbornly with all his teeth to mock even God’s punishment, and that he is reading this book to Beelzebub himself.
    • 4/5
      A must for those of philosophic.
    • 3/5
      It has been said that Thus Spoke Zarathustra is best read in high school because it is the only time a reader can tolerate such transparent exposition. This is probably accurate. I would recommend The Gay Science to a new reader of Nietzsche, but Thus Spoke Zarathustra is shorter and more popular.
    • 4/5
      Although Professor Alderman credits his own interpretation of Nietzsche as a derivation of Heidegger's, Alderman takes Zarathustra as the paradigm of the philosopher, leaving Heidegger to his Will to Power notebook. But Heidegger is wrong-- about philosophy and about Nietzsche and about Zarathustra...Zarathustra is NOT a proponent of objectivist nihilism. He is explicitly, explicitly and songfully, and beingfully trying to FREE humankind from metaphysics and its thin-lipped sour Schopenhauer bower. It is Socratic! The opposite of a Will with a need to be UBER. [do the love dance]
    • 5/5
      No book has influenced me as much as 'Zarathustra' did. Before the last pages were read, I already knew: "I will not read any comparable book ever again in my entire life" - because there probably isn't one. Nietzsche just steals the show with this book. The power that every single sentence contains cannot be described, therefore you just have to read it.
    • 5/5
      One of those books that, at the time, changes your whole world view...
    • 5/5
      Nietzsche was brilliant and insane. In fact, whatever disease that killed him 8 years after writing this book had already started by this time. His evolution of the "overman" (ubermensch) is created through the travels and musings of Zarathustra. The best conceivable description of the style is that of a negative version of Kahlil Gibran. It's earthy, it's about the earth, but it's a violent form of passion based on the least desirable creatures, both human and animal -- when you can tell the difference. During the 4 books, Zarathustra first learns not to talk to the common man (in the "marketplace"), then learns to conquer his nausea, and finally conquers his pity. His loyal companions -- a variety of animals but primarily a snake and an eagle -- crowd about him during his repeated returns to his cave, wherein he contemplates and discovers more meaning about the overman. The evolution of the overman would require three stages: that of a camel (carrying the load), that of the lion (fighting the dragon), and that of the child (asking the obvious questions?).
    • 4/5
      A classical work of filosophical significance. A treasure for the interested 'few'.
    • 5/5
      Love it! Translators seem to be enjoying something of a bitchfest contra Walter Kaufmann's earlier beautiful English translation, which doubles the fun really. Incorrigibly weird and deliriously funny - woe to anyone who teaches this as philosophy! No no no! No
    • 5/5
      This book is meant to be an anchor for Nietzsche's philosophical system. With that in mind it makes a great place for anyone interested in his works or of existentialism in general to begin. The exercise (read 'incredible difficulty') to tease Nietzsche's meaning out from the complex metaphors and puns that he employs is greatly alleviated by the translator's notes provided by Walter Kaufmann. These are helpful both to crystallize the function of each section and also to explain Nietzsche's elaborate plays on words, which often translate incompletely or not at all. This added guidance is often the difference between a successful or failed read of Zarathustra. The book is written largely as a series of sermons and parables by the teacher Zarathustra, a vehicle meant to lampoon the biblical teachings of Christ. The joke lies in the fact that Nietzsche is employing the stylistic trappings of Christianity to deliver an individualist message which was meant not just to criticize the traditional morality of the time, but to charge each individual with crafting their own replacement. It represents a major break with all preceding philosophies in that it abhors the metaphysical and divine as foundations of human morality and announces the need for valuations which acknowledge the relative and subjective nature of human life. Thus the teachings in Zarathustra are not just a rewriting of older moral systems with new objects of authority with differences only in ritual or mythical basis, but a radical shift in the relation of those moral systems in relation to the people who develop and practice them. Nietzsche's Zarathustra is one of the formative works of existential philosophy as well as one of the first works of what could be called modern philosophies.
    • 3/5
      I am always hopeful that a philosophy will confirm my beliefs and put them better than I can put them myself. I am always dissapointed that what I read fails to meet my expectations. I enjoyed this book a little more than most because of the way it was written. There were parts of the book where I did feel that Nietzsche did confirm my beliefs, and put things well. Much of the book either missed my expectation, or I simply couldn't see things the way they were intended. Interestingly enough, immediately after this I read Ibsen's "An Enemy of the People" where Ibsen outlines "the strongest man in the world". Contrasting that with Nietzsche's superman helped me get more out of each book.
    • 3/5
      I find a lot that is admirable in Nietzsche's philosophy... and there's some that i think Nietzsche was a bit naieve about. I found this book to be incredibly hard going, despite its easy 350 pages, it probably took me two weeks or more to finish. Mostly, i suppose, because the book is almost entirely composed of sermons by Nietzsche's Zarathustra with almost no motion or narration apart from his speaking. Also, Nietzsche seems to have written this book in almost a sort of prose-poetry, relying heavily on metaphor, his meaning is not always clear. I might have had an easier time of it if i were more familiar with some of his other works, so i could readily identify what he was refering to.In any case, this is a famous, important book for Western thought, arts, culture etc. You should read it, even if its hard. Some things that are worthwhile are.

    Aperçu du livre

    Ainsi Parlait Zarathoustra - Friedrich Nietzsche

    1HZbook_preview_excerpt.html}rG$42k+[Rkg FQIvUHt"3K`/#aZֿ="# vvmETeƏ~!tk_ ݍ/ەӮsmUWKjW ſnwݲXP?+> oedڢCP]XhɓnwPpkU-\]އb]}ׅz}V|~NBqXyS#+YT|bc Uo]{[t2Gd=o\kl/T2!B?ȿ0|}[|w-w3miMU ^XyvpV|d 9MlAU8.T ]|h6'ߺ.T~"4YMV(ڸA) dS<|.>ꆡkni[گ Ć]#w6p<c-h&龳S}8E1^xtcQ:;uCVW"㒋Kw͟|]v/7OqP=K߸kW\2\34 )JvmPظV!=隝,.uՖx_| O>@Jpa!X7]-x'|5݃j;DM|({E|W 2.ſP>_g|߯"߹.ޮYc+#|0< RvoqvxܱFxQzRyGnߖQW_]/P\}~Y|'W|?p~>xճO{/~}qh{'xL$|Fh#x˧#^=<~+~__]7 Q#B]1Uk[,viUEz?S.,-mvpVvp|Q"#]] "U0]9:q=u؟ 3V$,;O5'%P -S 8DRķc$eQ/Dp7-#5Z{ +ٮܖGzE NOF_CV U^˺dƢ$읰7NF>?-"Hw<;sQlIo-+WkF7mj]mk>?d0Dt+S pMem{/ȷGQezrV[}xt# p^J$JF,\*"5k;Qb*Q SDMʔn\v2Z) Y^f6.=CK4ƲNNJȷ[Ÿato^rNlՅ5O8".hxwIyUV+hkrJ,{"S٩09\n3䃼';Yx%|+ 2înx.||H;YNYqj_ CD/7CV1Q[HpPojr7V'/'‹rmbN*<`M ]cN1l<{/| NAXTZoO>P"_y,*jgR=_ΡR>DL{&k*<9nl^\X_Ж#i, k{c3acyw+㎞p?\YjB~ ^`ld1l[ 'Ȥ/rq|lw"U뾪'JPT3!!2S,r*66&&LvrƂ'97^E xNEjQyX/q{]"7~Lڋ1 +( t?uOQAW(,`us{-:c_x Z=9"YiK`^\Yv)+psT0gXҟJ^:86$Grq/ߡ겸 E {?݃o)-D&DSdwCjZ/W0A$h4Tٿ_M'O -A*6\H!ǃ$|Qh]޽ٸ 7B}7>gtpUz w\;(8BK>dùv?8{eIi[ḶxF7*?{[[lųE쁒S^wae*aj<0c0UuZg?_r 4ircpCEj['y៛BkITo3W.[\@v8~5[kvpU'Gp8L @Fۦ"<2iI<htu4-"x=ّBni@4,-AF\ϰPQ[K5-ecQ"`2WNq#SS@Rlv;fÞP+WIX 9: X0r71vϋ/5Us~e$X2`6 p72IʋvWW[1I'%i0#]SĊs!R=ș7\]s{AVؙz qב;qx7^VlnMO-Qw 1TƓKQĶ⥠ͫc" ƥǴpu'~&lU^N˜7J=aQXG*kգ CY:tx{/:wXcOB6:83Zo#&`

    _;bwT2q ]&=.>ϥOpXp:W1FɌR A^߮^2ȝ]<\p u4AbN:ߵLY\i;k9F-Ě wcLE[Hf@pC=kdŦZ~N B"Y4V%&zENG:1z1@;3Rڤm` JWa>%xwڧ=G ժ)&] LCsDwưi(<)^&p30{ k_ծ]3Q[X:'V4=karg$ TVOaͷ#-z,Dd{CI\: qo[cc"n ,X1]Cҝ:`Etk1r8] 煇*1e[upLonN==#D>u և9 mu.sKBgl%bK]k5p#mz X{&&bWs$0[G_ߤd=UҸ|]5t<~^CD5'!I,^ʋC W@xU!jvDV %$%`"ĝ!|^XTf}iYk \:'RNN4d(xh&ѩjSuAGQ(BOKрN|b(݂X!Z͔0VdŌ|} ~ CT%> 6&8(z9 [g?9ihq/!qL鼭L,J`ӽ:Ex~ҝQࢸ 3l, 2w~͖ٲyP':;".wԢ9+u'! ]TeqIqE6AHW/ژCUKQAXU Ø?H,[ \?zá[F ǢFqrHoiꢸuυ \O0U6GkrIfUfXaNҩY Qdlc8~\z9{CP~ȢO|hI ݙWQai(1g>I-5O`Ƒ5% ߭ڮ2C&LOrgO&p'uqQP9rs-w f8RB DN52cP/PČ:=cwz"*r))^mXNԠZ*.~o9_sʖsq xH"&^# fFG\5iSS @[^aPǬ\ӆkD#@g\Q~t=FwÝo]EɩzUo\>E,;J3g@- {h^S}̱]Nσ3䨞ac$8Lo'>6?SM&oIR<$(%kpHyd/3@PsruGݺ Ǜ;s"RiN߻f( #xbg֛ڿC /&hdY<\y:i6ZβAїY *tn1BȚi!,R8RT#AK~>N#aމ|.$ËBދke "hdMj SL:Xa}F:Z!^?{3uJl Q+Ӈ!1kDx" jtQ /bY{9OWŠNyM{gP;+WKx[) SyF쓘-{&AFQn HePLJ0FW{oz 7`c\g+WdaFVOqMT|RT06{4إKtEtUrO2ǹIb 0]T1;ʋP )]sp#bONkdie' -H{"OZuY/冦zknDLߤMt hD$~R.ЃT1zI;Cԑp s= |*EWDڟ&T v9ӣ&쫴M ZSﭧBy4TqP@0QnRzMAnچRU='SC7MZ.-kĸ&g%4;LCװ I{‹ &n 62u7i/dDqM͈_H7 dM~DFdDA=.&},$ɽ:N?\1fw6X~WhDBCk b w sHXyDiU"V(Y#q )F˜R..8J[1b(t۬\(]JrS"J4$-ا~)f~؎h=S$'Et?s9>u^y D!hվޤ[V,*=*V A"4 9RGGa$0HiHrd:jЏM VA' 2vh!TZX}1@ ~W| 9$!X߰0(Z 9u58ѣ󍷼޸_⅟flYև&)UvZyyLw:ٷ[bq|JVya3%DbBVV.[[-EԚV j,loWm #2$+{S=tcjV, 8ԛfC^F Γcx܄W,kEq~&ToOVLW4S8O!r!X%u%x'kP) ݙ<SN]wפ@[k#1]_rWw0\DO0X(VUES,FIx"HXCʔ-҂*[xkR{q6+8kNO.kdJm]ˡdL&\MuK/|F !s>e (X(d2:jEe9s+6v[9ޖ^k` !ϊv S#k4M蘤/[6vZ-jC~_<Щ&41|, 3 5_}r_M\٧P;PKkaiSLޕcuZanqMV4DM8 /cňbz]YxP߲bcE85uVb \g+ VQ'ɿUqEyH R)!Df40mEezxؚBKnպ" PNxr>隣&]son|snᑵF!c[ !G}{N+g`1t**H;kT /ZsGkc@>%& Z(>-!RV*K۲$9QLA0%Lq\Yqʓ 4Zxq%(Ȍ24Im)BBS 7*2hٙKsxBuGlTwA`*Dsir!7+VZgH0g52Iwg\?4eU)jA7dt7(xR<:b-ROPr74ډg:&NEJRޱƧ z Jh]+"޴5kQW9NlV̯8Ixh0+ 0y5יN.rr ?ї+Yj"%f/3nC4zP ,1(uB~l @h"%vHEY2IB$4p{J%uZakv)ȴHP6ڲ o12?9Z XkNc?,֨J#}[Nu5K!#ȳ>< {XMSd!]7xbX'OU=hVVUj^j4 4(+Q4,Nc QϽLrVd o W.T]‡X_/$D=uDk]'RD6exK @QlH d@ ó=0|WjB" YB*¦ i6w$PSWk^"B!2h^=9f$+·Y0/afq1=#bΉb7)@ ph CKE6D }(1(UK6,!6Bʝ)pM@L% ]8J^3 cTtcqJXjи jmcS hZ ͍Ka7LuE<Z74^A@;XĶ,CJ}g5C?@4GWaE}C K4SPң˜Y*dLl#%ՆAO.Вp{o8QgiB5|VeK(ͻwEr1i>yPףHsUI֛@G fHEP-(ɞ1(dEza54 .@sBe),E]g!\鑝_[WT(>5 u9;H%8;vY` օڴv+>A8E]r!9>xphdm0jOmWBΒ.tP,H#ynh}|PeP0ӵDF. 6qz%P⳶OWW4,56i8vEx 1bOiа$iKT),Gw Cؙ 0 442:O D2&cůhZl;.Ee-H6ٗA9 lƺnԵ~zr8n#P6D[ %dk 6i^.54߶wr򽪁@JBHmNcݔԘo% v@W{ȧUk|35 ÆD#oGElZ[D9VIwXTRQc&xruG}D>NM?X n;,^ ƜZ5( c3S4N}X_DP2t8PdS#KKy-R%~֚)5[nn2"{٫Q8юuEߠv=W3b0Fpjpʈ^ʘ"I7\-}+gS;SX^LX->@[-+"0\;=K˂%h2]Uv"VW81U [O #67{ )5?kp8NMWgqDMx(7?P,M2g@ lbedb儎>ָy!SCB {vM\PjFmpK3k&֭:96e$؋٧ an^{w/'Zj 6CuYs /vj+#1))Q|Kiҕ"q hXTы9ʼ5TZ0 {⢥GZ˜bmԷDdOlEZgzcQEE7GM_xdWGXsjĿ;CWrD$comźj?*]T'sa'n̋}PD-O C VUOsuN.!N $OZÆY=5s{#(ϱAdp#rP'"O zbbZaʰ⯭#f *4!TRc;(l9S5⳧{~tuŗW|/^gP>/~^q@9Q!$c:} y&M\lMOYzf?gFCuoCL?nǒaİ@.T?_R̊WN ҷg&O_`H>26;èZ%gDW` C-.{.hCX1tG?aqOK:Ӫ=glNj?5,\HjY@:z BF+ 7Dlɷo"(~iO,9u5ۆ ^2Hkd xKW:y__/.vWX1|W=mR;x\Jh;.fMgXĖӏ޽&$NZbфF%w2M0Xc^*8k+'^s;aTg_~6dx)|}VLAA7(c`,>۹qݿ{}iIlՍ3L@_C'yvtgho@Ґn)8sLҀ

    Vous aimez cet aperçu ?
    Page 1 sur 1